Drawing for CHEF TONY MEROLA

USPTO serial 75865897

CHEF TONY MEROLA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KOVALSKY, LAURA G
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHEF TONY MEROLA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DANIEL S. POLLEY

DANIEL S POLLEY MALIN, HALEY & DIMAGGIO, PA1936 S ANDREWS AVEFT LAUDERDALE, FL 33316-2859UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016recipe books and cookbooksACTIVE—
029fruit, meat and vegetable salads; snack dips excluding salsa and other sauces used as dipsACTIVE—
031fresh fruits; fresh vegetablesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 21, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 21, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 2, 2002EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Oct 4, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Sep 6, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 9, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 20, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 16, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 16, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 12, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance