Drawing for INFINITY

USPTO serial 75865964

INFINITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OH, WON TEAK
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INFINITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey M. Becker

Jeffrey M. Becker Haynes and Boone, LLP2323 Victory Avenue, Suite 700Dallas, TX 75219UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007PARTS OF MACHINES, NAMELY, MECHANICAL SEALSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 27, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 27, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 24, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 12, 2003EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 25, 2003EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Sep 19, 2002EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 30, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 28, 2002EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 7, 2002EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 7, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 2002EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 25, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 14, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 12, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 8, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 29, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 6, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 5, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 5, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 4, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance