USPTO serial 75866334
METRO GOLF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COTTON, AMY PAGE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with METRO GOLF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan Chertkof Munsat
SUSAN CHERTKOF MUNSAT LICHTMAN, TRISTER, SINGER & ROSS1666 CONNECTICUT AVE N WSTE 500WASHINGTON, DC 20009Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Summerville Press, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Summerville Press, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named METRO GOLF
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 25, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 13, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 9, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 9, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 9, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 22, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 9, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 17, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 15, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 15, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 9, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |