USPTO serial 75866362
BABY NEWTON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KELLY, JOHN M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BABY NEWTON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mei-Lan Stark
MS MEI-LAN STARK THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY500 S BUENA VIS STBURBANK, CA 91521-0633UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Games, playthings and toys for children, namely puppets, plush toys, crib toys, electronic toys, board games, electronic games, role-playing games, and music, art language, poetry, math and science discovery toys, all limited to goods other than computers, computer hardware, computer operating system software and computer peripherals | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 22, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 20, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 19, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 7, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 2, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 20, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 16, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 11, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 11, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 20, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |