USPTO serial 75866510
ROYAL COMMAND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAFORTE, RENE M.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROYAL COMMAND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SHARON A. BLINKOFF
SHARON A BLINKOFF BUCHANAN INGERSOLL PC140 BROADWAY 35TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Men's perfumes, colognes, body mists, after shaves, shower gels, and lotions, namely, after-shave lotions, body lotions, facial lotions, shaving lotions, skin cleansing lotions, and skin lotions | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 31, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 30, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 8, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 27, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 5, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 12, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 7, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 30, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 28, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 24, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 21, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 5, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 4, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 15, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 1, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |