Drawing for AG SERIE

USPTO serial 75866911

AG SERIE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FICKES, JERI J
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AG SERIE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark Harrison

MARK HARRISON VENABLEP O BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043-4385UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009TYPEFACE FONTS, NAMELY, ALPHABET SYMBOLS AND GRAPHIC FONTS, RECORDED ON MAGNETIC MEDIA FOR REPRODUCTION AND DUPLICATION FOR THE CREATION OF TEXTS USING GRAPHIC TECHNIQUES; DIGITALLY STORED TYPEFACES, IN PARTICULAR ON ELECTRIC AND/OR MAGNETIC DATA CARRIERS, MAGNETIC DISCS, CD ROMS AND DISKETTES; COMPUTER SOFTWARE IN THE FIELD OF DESKTOP PUBLISHING; COMPUTER SOFTWARE DOWNLOADABLE FROM GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORKS FOR GENERATION OF TYPEFACES AND FONTSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 27, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 6, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Nov 19, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Nov 19, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 21, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 22, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 15, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 3, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 3, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 15, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 8, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 8, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 27, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 30, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 30, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 18, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 19, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 19, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 2, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 9, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 20, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 30, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 7, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 7, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 12, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance