USPTO serial 75866912
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark Harrison
MARK HARRISON VENABLEP O BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043-9998UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | TYPEFACE FONTS, NAMELY, ALPHABET SYMBOLS AND GRAPHIC FONTS, RECORDED ON MAGNETIC MEDIA FOR REPRODUCTION AND DUPLICATION FOR THE CREATION OF TEXTS USING GRAPHIC TECHNIQUES; DIGITALLY STORED TYPEFACES, IN PARTICULAR ON ELECTRIC AND/OR MAGNETIC DATA CARRIERS, MAGNETIC DISCS, CD ROMS AND DISKETTES; COMPUTER SOFTWARE IN THE FIELD OF DESKTOP PUBLISHING; COMPUTER SOFTWARE DOWNLOADABLE FROM GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORKS FOR GENERATION OF TYPEFACES AND FONTS | ACTIVE | Mar 18, 2000 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 25, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 25, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 25, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 25, 2004 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 28, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 23, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 17, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 5, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 5, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 19, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 24, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2000 | IURF | IU INFORMAL RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2000 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Jun 1, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |