Drawing for WHITTINGHAM

USPTO serial 75866912

WHITTINGHAM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MATTHEWS, AMOS
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WHITTINGHAM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark Harrison

MARK HARRISON VENABLEP O BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043-9998UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009TYPEFACE FONTS, NAMELY, ALPHABET SYMBOLS AND GRAPHIC FONTS, RECORDED ON MAGNETIC MEDIA FOR REPRODUCTION AND DUPLICATION FOR THE CREATION OF TEXTS USING GRAPHIC TECHNIQUES; DIGITALLY STORED TYPEFACES, IN PARTICULAR ON ELECTRIC AND/OR MAGNETIC DATA CARRIERS, MAGNETIC DISCS, CD ROMS AND DISKETTES; COMPUTER SOFTWARE IN THE FIELD OF DESKTOP PUBLISHING; COMPUTER SOFTWARE DOWNLOADABLE FROM GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORKS FOR GENERATION OF TYPEFACES AND FONTSACTIVEMar 18, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 25, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 25, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 25, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 25, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 25, 2004EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Dec 16, 2003CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Nov 6, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 28, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 12, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 23, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 17, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 5, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 5, 2002IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Jun 5, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 5, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 19, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 24, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 2, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 15, 2000IURFIU INFORMAL RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2000IUFFUSE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES—
Jun 1, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 19, 2000IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance