USPTO serial 75867313
E-TERRA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, EUGENIA K
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with E-TERRA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David J. Sprinkle
EUGENE W WONG LASHER HOLZAPFEL SPERRY & EBBERSONSTE 2600601 UN STSEATTLE, WA 98101-4000Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software to assist the energy industry in the generation, distribution, transmission and trading of energy, and market management, namely, platform software which is used to open and close breakers, for supervisory control and data acquisition of remote field devices, real-time generation control, real-time transmission network analysis, and for dispatcher training simulation | ACTIVE | Nov 12, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2004 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 29, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 7, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2000 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 16, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 26, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |