USPTO serial 75867490
STAMPS.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STAMPS.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Santa Monica, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gary A. Hecker
GARY A HECKER HECKER & HARRIMAN1925 CENTURY PARK ESTE 2300LOS ANGELES, CA 90067Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | distributorship services featuring the sale of office supplies, office equipment, clothing, and general consumer goods including electronic products, movies, compact discs, books, DVD players, tape players, tape recorders, receivers, speakers, televisions, VCRs, home theater systems, bookshelf stereo systems, CD players, mini disc players, radios, camcorders, computer hardware and software for use in browsing and navigating a global computer network, computers, computer peripherals, computer software, digital video camera systems, and cameras | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 12, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 3, 2002 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 10, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 24, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |