Drawing for VIRTUAL DATA PORTAL

USPTO serial 75867517

VIRTUAL DATA PORTAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMPSON, LAVERNE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VIRTUAL DATA PORTAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James J. Murphy

JAMES J MURPHY WINSTEAD SECHREST & MINICK PC5400 RENAISSANCE TWR1201 ELM STDALLAS, TX 75270

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER SOFTWARE USED TO ENABLE A WEB-BROWSER-LIKE INTERFACE FOR PROVIDING REMOTE CONTROL VIA A GLOBAL OR LOCAL COMPUTER NETWORK FOR SUPPORTING MONITORING STATION COMPONENTS OF MANUFACTURING PROCESSES WITHIN A USER FACTORYACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 8, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 17, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 17, 2002EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jul 1, 2002CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
May 21, 2002RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Apr 24, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 24, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 25, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 16, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 16, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 8, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 23, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 15, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance