USPTO serial 75867751
WRIGLEY'S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WRIGLEY'S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jack D. Nimz
JACK D NIMZ WM WRIGLEY JR COMPANY410 N MICHIGAN AVECHICAGO, IL 60611UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | MEDICATED CHEWING GUMS; NAMELY, MEDICATED CHEWING GUM FOR THE TREATMENT OF COLDS, MEDICATED CHEWING GUM FOR THE TREATMENT OF COUGH, MEDICATED CHEWING GUM FOR THE TREATMENT OF BAD BREATH, MEDICATED CHEWING GUM FOR WEIGHT MANAGEMENT/LOSS, MEDICATED CHEWING GUM FOR THE TREATMENT OF INDIGESTION, MEDICATED CHEWING GUM FOR THE TREATMENT OF HEARTBURN, MEDICATED CHEWING GUM FOR THE TREATMENT OF ALLERGIES, MEDICATED CHEWING GUM FOR THE TREATMENT OF NASAL CONGESTION, MEDICATED CHEWING GUM FOR THE TREATMENT OF SORE THROAT PAIN, MEDICATED CHEWING GUM FOR THE TREATMENT OF BODY ACHES, MEDICATED CHEWING GUM FOR THE TREATMENT OF MOUTH GERMS, MEDICATED CHEWING GUM FOR THE TREATMENT OF HYPERTENSION AND MEDICATED CHEWING GUM FOR THE TREATMENT OF NICOTINE ADDICTION | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 3, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 13, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 24, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 21, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 20, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 28, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 22, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 19, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 19, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 31, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 18, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 27, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |