Drawing for FBC INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

USPTO serial 75868052

FBC INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DAWE III, WILLIAM H
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FBC INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert W. Strozier

ROBERT W STROZIER ROBERT W STROZIER, PLLC2925 BRIARPARK DRSTE 930HOUSTON, TX 77042

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035business consultation in the field of promotion of goods and services of others through advertisements in directoriesACTIVE—
042technical consultation in the field of design, programming and implementation services associated with customer relations, message processing and rating, carrier access and customer billing, and installation and maintenance of telecommunications systems and equipmentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 29, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 29, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 6, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 21, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 29, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 28, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 20, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 8, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 10, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 8, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 4, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 3, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance