Drawing for CUMMINS INDUSTRIAL TOOLS

USPTO serial 75868279

CUMMINS INDUSTRIAL TOOLS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2514072Status 900
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 4, 2001
Examiner
MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CUMMINS INDUSTRIAL TOOLS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Deborah Schavey Ruff

Deborah Schavey Ruff Mayer Brown LLP71 South Wacker DriveChicago, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Retail store services featuring industrial tools and accessoriesEXPIRED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 27, 2014CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Dec 6, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 6, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 28, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 28, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 3, 2008NOSUNOTICE OF SUIT—
Dec 12, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 5, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Dec 3, 2007CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Dec 3, 2007CANDCANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999—
Nov 26, 20078.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Jun 15, 20078.AFREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED—
Jun 15, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 2, 2007CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 30, 2006PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jul 6, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 24, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 4, 2001R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 11, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 22, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 18, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 30, 2001REINREINSTATED—
Feb 20, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 6, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 5, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 23, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 5, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance