USPTO serial 75868525
PROKIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHISOLM, KEVON
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PROKIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Hsin Shih Hsiang, Tainan, TW
Hsin Shih Hsiang, Tainan, TW
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan P. Willson
SUSAN P WILLSON SHERIDAN ROSS PC1560 BROADWAY STE 1200DENVER, CO 80202-5141UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | VIDEO AND ELECTRONIC PROJECTION DISPLAYS AND COMPONENTS COMPRISING ALL OF THE FOLLOWING, OPTICAL PROJECTION UNIT, FAN, LAMP, POLARIZERS, PRISMS, FILTERS, LIQUID DISPLAY PANEL, CIRCUIT BOARD, LENSES, COVER AND MIRRORS; LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY BACK-LIGHT MODULES COMPRISING LOWER PRISMS, UPPER PRISMS; ELECTRO-LUMINESCENT DISPLAYS COMPRISING ELECTRO-LUMINESCENT PHOSPHOR, SILVER, COPPER AND CERAMIC MATERIALS, THIN FILM ELECTRO-LUMINESCENT DEVICES USED FOR ILLUMINATION LIGHT SOURCES FOR HEAD MOUNTED DISPLAYS, PROJECTION DISPLAYS, LOW-VOLTAGE PHOSPHORS, LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY PHOSPHORS, PLASMA DISPLAYS; BLANK CD-ROMS, CD-ROMS FEATURING MUSIC, BLANK DVDS, DVDS FEATURING MUSIC, DIGITAL STILL CAMERAS, COMPUTER PRINTERS, LIGHT PENS, FACSIMILE MACHINES, LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAYS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 24, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 22, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 29, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 18, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 20, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 24, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 1, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2001 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |