USPTO serial 75868659
BUYDOMAINS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OSLICK, SCOTT
- Law office
- OFFICE OF THE TRADEMARK COMMISSIONER
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BUYDOMAINS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Erik B. Cherdak
ROBERT M O'CONNELL JR GOODWIN PROCTER LLP53 STATE STTRADEMARK ADMINISTRATORBOSTON, MA 02109Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Brokerage in the field of global computer network domain names for use in connection with and individual user address, via a global computer network | ACTIVE | Jul 15, 1999 |
| 042 | Registration of domain names for the identification the identification of users on a global computer network, via a global computer network | ACTIVE | Jul 15, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 3, 2005 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| May 3, 2005 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| May 3, 2005 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 15, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 20, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 12, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 30, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |