USPTO serial 75868916
HOME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAMOTHE, LESLEY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HOME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Maylands, South Australia 5067, AU
Maylands, South Australia 5067, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph A. Sebolt
JOSEPH A SEBOLT SAND & SEBOLT4940 MUNSON ST NWAEGIS TWR STE 1100CANTON, OH 44718Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER UTILITY AND OPERATING SYSTEMS, GENERAL PURPOSE COMMUNICATIONS CONNECTIVITY SOFTWARE USED TO ESTABLISH AND MANAGE CONNECTIONS BETWEEN A COMPUTER AND COMPUTER NETWORKS, COMMUNICATIONS SOFTWARE USED TO TRANSMIT INFORMATION FROM AN ON-LINE DATABASE FEATURING MONITORING UTILITY SERVICES AND SECURITY INFORMATION, COMPUTER HARDWARE, DATA PROCESSORS AND PERIPHERALS, SOFTWARE FOR USE IN PROVIDING REMOTE CONTROL OF APPLIANCES USING THE WORLD WIDE WEB | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVISION OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONNECTIONS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK AND PROVIDING MULTIPLE USER ACCESS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE AND UPDATING OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE; PROVING A WEBSITE ON A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK FEATURING HOME AUTOMATION; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, CREATING AND IMPLEMENTING WEB SITES FOR OTHERS, COMPUTER SOFTWARE CONSULTING SERVICES AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FOR OTHERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by UNITED TECHNOLOGY PTY LTD
- Other trademarks owned by UNITED TECHNOLOGY PTY LTD
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named HOME
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 27, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 7, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 7, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 30, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 20, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 7, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 29, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |