USPTO serial 75868958
EBUSINESS SYSTEMS FOR ELENDING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 9, 2002
- Examiner
- CARRUTHERS, SUE
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EBUSINESS SYSTEMS FOR ELENDING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roberta Jacobs-Meadway
ROBERTA JACOBS-MEADWAY AKIN, GUMP, STRAUSS, HAUER & FELD,LLPONE COMMERCE SQ2005 MARKET ST 22ND FLPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-7086Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software provided to mortgage lenders for supporting loan origination, loan processing, loan purchasing, and loan securitization | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 15, 1999 |
| 042 | Consulting services provided to mortgage lenders in connection with planning, developing and deploying computer hardware and software systems for use in connection with loan origination, loan processing, loan purchasing, and loan securitization | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 15, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 17, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 9, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 1, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 24, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 12, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |