USPTO serial 75869042
SERENGETI AN ELF SOLUTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OSLICK, SCOTT
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SERENGETI AN ELF SOLUTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott G Warner
SCOTT G WARNER GARVEY SCHUBERT & BARER1191 2ND AVE 18TH FLSEATTLE, WA 98101-2939UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | SPECIALIZED APPLICATION SERVICE PROVIDER (ASP), NAMELY, PROVIDING TO LEGAL AND CLAIMS DEPARTMENTS OF CORPORATIONS AND INSURANCE COMPANIES, AND TO OUTSIDE LAW FIRMS WHO REPRESENT THEM, INTEGRATED COMPUTER SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS AND DATA STORAGE TO PERFORM VARIOUS LEGAL AND RELATED FUNCTIONS, INCLUDING CASE MANAGEMENT AND ANALYSIS, ELECTRONIC INVOICING, TIME AND BILLING, VIDEOCONFERENCING, DOCUMENT CONSTRUCTION, BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE EXTRAPOLATION, AND SECURE MESSAGING, IN A SECURE BUSINESS-TO-BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT, VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK | ACTIVE | Sep 30, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 29, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 12, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |