USPTO serial 75869538
TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TRANSIT AUTHORITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carole R. Klein
CAROLE R KLEIN BOX TMSUMORGAN LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP1111 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | JEWEL BOXES OF COMMON METAL | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | HANDBAGS, TOTE BAGS, BACKPACKS, SOFT AND HARD LUGGAGE, COSMETIC BAGS SOLD EMPTY; SMALL LEATHER GOODS, NAMELY, WALLETS, KEY FOBS, BILLFOLDS, CREDIT CARD CASES, PASSPORT CASES AND COIN PURSES | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | JEWEL BOXES NOT OF METAL | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Bueno of California
- Other trademarks owned by Bueno of California
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named TRANSIT AUTHORITY
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2004 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 12, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 5, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 1, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 5, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 6, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 14, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 28, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 5, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 23, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 13, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 6, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jan 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |