USPTO serial 75869626
Serial No. 75869626
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BERK, STEVEN R
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 75869626?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Yoqneam Ilit, IL
Yoqneam Ilit, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gabrielle A. Holley
JAMES R MENKER PILLSBURY WINTHROP LLPP O BOX 10500MCLEAN, VA 22102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | WIRELESS ACCESS COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT, NAMELY BASE STATIONS COMPRISING RADIO RECEIVERS AND TRANSMITTERS, ANTENNAS AND SIGNAL PROCESSORS FOR HANDLING COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN SUBSCRIBERS AND LOCAL EXCHANGES FOR COMMUNICATIONS SWITCHES; WIRELESS ACCESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT, NAMELY ANTENNA CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR BASE STATIONS COMPRISING ANTENNAS, BASE STATION CONTROLLERS, SOFTWARE FOR CONTROLLING ANTENNAS AND HAND HELD CONTROLLERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | INSTALLATION OF WIRELESS ACCESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, NAMELY BASE STATIONS AND BASE STATION ANTENNAS INCLUDING THE LOCATION OF THE ANTENNAS AND BASE RECEIVER SUBSYSTEMS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT CONSULTATION IN THE FIELD OF WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, NAMELY DESIGNING, MEASURING, AND ADJUSTING BASE STATIONS AND BASE STATION ANTENNAS INCLUDING OPTIMIZING THE EFFICIENCY OF THE WIRELESS ACCESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS TO CUSTOMER SPECIFICATIONS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 15, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 9, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 6, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 24, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 10, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 31, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 14, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 25, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 25, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |