USPTO serial 75869928
BEERS.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GASKINS, TONJA M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BEERS.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Helen Hill Minsker
HELEN HILL MINSKER BANNER & WITCOFF LTD1001 G ST NW 11TH FLWASHINGTON, DC 20001-4597UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, NAMELY, BREWED, MALT-BASED ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES IN THE NATURE OF BEERS AND NON-ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, NAMELY, NON-ALCOHOLIC BEERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | LOAP | LETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 9, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 7, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 22, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 25, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 4, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 25, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |