Drawing for FASTRAQ

USPTO serial 75871101

FASTRAQ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARROLL, DORITT
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FASTRAQ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles D. Segelbaum

CHARLES D SEGELBAUM FREDRIKSON & BYRON, PA1100 INTERNATIONAL CTR900 SECOND AVE SMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010medical testing and diagnostic equipment, namely, mobile testing and diagnostic reading and communication modules for use in hospitals and hospital emergency departments for the analysis of body fluids, replaceable testing cartridges that interface with medical testing and diagnostic modules for the testing and analysis of body fluids, handheld communications devices for remote transmission of patient data to medical testing and diagnostic equipment, all for diagnostic purposes, none of the aforesaid goods relating to the area of anesthesiaACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 10, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 4, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 26, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 12, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 22, 2002ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 9, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 20, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 19, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 19, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 22, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 21, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 20, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 8, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance