USPTO serial 75871182
PHATRAT TECHNOLOGY FAT RAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2897535Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 26, 2004
- Examiner
- LEVINE, HOWARD B
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PHATRAT TECHNOLOGY FAT RAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LAFAYETTE, CO
Longmont, CO
Longmont, CO
Longmont, CO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Curtis A. Vock
Curtis A. Vock Lathrop GPM LLP4845 Pearl East CircleSuite 201BOULDER, CO 80301-6112Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | business consulting services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | providing action sport performance information to others with regard to airtime, force, speed, power, G's absorbed, drop distance and other matrics characterizing action sports, athletic and motorized performances, training, and competitions | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PHATRAT TECHNOLOGY, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by PhatRat Technology, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by PhatRat Technology, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by PhatRat Technology, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named PHATRAT TECHNOLOGY FAT RAT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2025 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 26, 2023 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2020 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED | — |
| Jun 5, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2014 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2014 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 26, 2014 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 26, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 18, 2014 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 19, 2009 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 9, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 1, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 5, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 5, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 21, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 27, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 14, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 21, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 21, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 26, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 6, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 11, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |