USPTO serial 75871887
CRYOFLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEVINE, HOWARD B
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CRYOFLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CRITICAL CARE INNOVATIONS, INC.
CHANTILLY, VA
West Palm Beach, FL
West Palm Beach, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL A. SLAVIN
MICHAEL A SLAVIN MCHALE & SLAVIN, PA2855 PGA BLVDPALM BEACH GARDENS, FL 33410UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | FULL LINE SURGICAL APPARATUS, INSTRUMENTS, AND EQUIPMENT RELATED TO THE FIELD OF CRYOSURGERY | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CRITICAL CARE INNOVATIONS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CryoFlex, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by CryoFlex, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named CRYOFLEX
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 20, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 14, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 27, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 23, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 30, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 6, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 30, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 30, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 23, 2004 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 15, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 26, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2002 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Sep 25, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 3, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 20, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 14, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |