USPTO serial 75871964
DEVICE CITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODSAID, IRA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DEVICE CITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roberta S. Bren
ROBERTA S BREN OBLON, SPIVAK, MCCLELLAND, ET ALFOURTH FL1755 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWYARLINGTON, VA 22202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | ONLINE RETAIL SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF SOFTWARE AND TOOLS FOR DEVELOPING APPLICATIONS FOR MOBILE AND WIRELESS ITEMS INCLUDING COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR USE IN DEVELOPING, COMPILING AND EXECUTING OTHER COMPUTER PROGRAMS ON COMPUTERS, COMPUTER NETWORKS AND GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS, PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANTS, INTERNET APPLIANCES AND MOBILE COMPUTERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY CREATING AND PROVIDING LINKS AND INDEXES OF INFORMATION, SITES AND OTHER RESOURCES AVAILABLE ON COMPUTER NETWORKS; SEARCHING AND RETRIEVlNG INFORMATION, SITES AND OTHER RESOURCES AVAILABLE ON COMPUTER NETWORKS FOR OTHERS; PROVISION OF TRAINING MATERIALS, CONSULTING SERVICES AND ON-LINE FORUMS FOR INTERACTION WITH USERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 1, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |