USPTO serial 75872077
LIVING WELL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORDOVA, RAUL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LIVING WELL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PURVI J. PATEL
PURVI J PATEL HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP901 MAIN ST STE 3100DALLAS, TX 75202-3789UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Promoting the goods and services of others by conducting direct mail campaigns and special events in the fields of lifestyle management and health and fitness | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Targeted Marketing Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Targeted Marketing Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by BRIERLEY & PARTNERS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named LIVING WELL
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 27, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 13, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 21, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 6, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 15, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 3, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 22, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 17, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 17, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 16, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 16, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 13, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 13, 2002 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 6, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 23, 2001 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 23, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 22, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 16, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 17, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 9, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |