USPTO serial 75872354
POWERFOLD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LINCOSKI JR, JOHN T
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with POWERFOLD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
9201 BX Drachten, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KEITH W. MEDANSKY
KEITH W MEDANSKY PIPER MARBURY RUDNICK & WOLFEP O BOX 64807CHICAGO, IL 60664-0807UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Mail processing machines, namely, perforated document splitting machines, envelope extracting machines, document inserting machines, letter extracting machines, letter folding machines, letter opening machines, letter sorting machines, postage tape dispensing machines and counter top postage tape dispensing machines for post offices, addressing machines, parts and aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Meters for tracking postal charge-backs and electronic postal scales, namely document weighing and measuring apparatus and instruments, such apparatus also as parts of mailing and document handling machines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 2001 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |