USPTO serial 75872439
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
87011 Labuan F.T., MY
87011 Labuan F.T., MY
87011 Labuan F.T., MY
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cheryl S. Scotney
Cheryl S. Scotney Keating Muething & Klekamp PLL1 East Fourth StreetSuite 1400Cincinnati, OH 45202| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | [ Retail store services, wholesale store services, and wholesale distributorships, all featuring the pharmaceutical goods of others; ] professional business consultancy for pharmaceutical companies; providing statistical information relevant to the pharmaceutical industry; business research on pharmaceutical goods; dissemination of advertising for others via an on-line electronic communications network [ and distribution of printed marketing materials in the field of pharmaceuticals ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 1, 1998 |
| 039 | [ DELIVERY OF PHARMACEUTICAL GOODS TO HOSPITALS AND PHARMACIES BY MEANS OF LAND, AIR OR SEA TRANSPORTATION; ] ELECTRONIC STORAGE FOR OTHERS OF PHARMACEUTICAL DATA [ ; WAREHOUSE STORAGE OF PHARMACEUTICAL GOODS ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 1, 1998 |
| 042 | Providing an on-line computer database in the field of pharmaceutical and the pharmaceuticals industry; computer programming for others; updating of computer software for others; computer software design for others [ ; computer timesharing services and providing an on-line database on global computer networks in the field of pharmocology; rental of computer software ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 1, 1998 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2025 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 29, 2023 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2014 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 1, 2014 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 1, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 20, 2014 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 16, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 28, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 10, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 21, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 15, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 31, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 1, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 27, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 1, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 8, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 19, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 27, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 5, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 29, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |