USPTO serial 75873043
CONCUR EWORKPLACE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FICKES, JERI J
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CONCUR EWORKPLACE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Everett E. Fruehling
EVERETT E FRUEHLING VISOMARK LAW GROUP, PLLC1415 WESTERN AVE STE 501SEATTLE, WA 98101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business management services conducted via global and local computer networks, including providing analysis, information, data and database management and business reports relating to time and expense data, corporate and enterprise budgeting, procurement, business facilities management, hourly billing records and data, travel booking, human resources, employee benefits and records and other personnel data; providing corporate enterprise database and records management; providing automated analysis and management of data concerning enterprises resource allocation, budgeting, productivity management, and business facilities management | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 20, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 20, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 2003 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 13, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 7, 2002 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |