Drawing for EJURIST

USPTO serial 75873340

EJURIST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SALEMI, DOMINICK
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EJURIST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CAROLE F. BARRETT

CAROLE F BARRETT COUDERT BROTHERS600 BEACH ST THIRD FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94109UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038webcasting audio/visual programming via global computer networks for legal professionals and their clients, on-line messaging services, namely, electronic transmission of data, images, and documents for legal professionals and their clients via computer terminals over global computer networks, electronic mail services provided to legal professionals and their clients, electronic filing services, namely, the transmission of legal documents via computer terminals over global computer networks on behalf of legal professionals and their clientsACTIVE—
042company providing information in the field for legal professional and their clients, namely, legal research materials, directories of legal resources, and substantive information about the law via global computer network, data encryption services provided to legal professionals and their clients via global computer networks, interactive on-line document sharing capabilities over computer networks and global computer networks, to two or more legal professional and their clients with access to such computer networks and global computer networks, litigation supportACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 14, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 24, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 2, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 12, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 2, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 2, 2002PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 18, 2001PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 8, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 24, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 24, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 23, 2000ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 22, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance