USPTO serial 75873484
Serial No. 75873484
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BORSUK, ESTHER
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 75873484?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BCSI INC.(F/K/A/ BROADWING COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES INC.)
CINCINNATI, OH
Other trademarks owned by BCSI INC.(F/K/A/ BROADWING COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES INC.)
WASHINGTON, DC
Cincinnati, OH
Cincinnati, OH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JEFFREY M. GITCHEL
JEFFREY M GITCHEL KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART LLPHENRY W OLIVER BLDG535 SMITHFIELD STPITTSBURGH, PA 15222-2312Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BCSI INC.(F/K/A/ BROADWING COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES INC.)
- Other trademarks owned by BROADWING COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Unite Incorporated
- Other trademarks owned by Unite Incorporated
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 10, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 6, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 29, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 19, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 20, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 9, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 13, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 20, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 28, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 8, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 4, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 21, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |