USPTO serial 75873722
AAFENDI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BAIRD, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AAFENDI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Centreville, VA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ajay A. Jagtiani
AJAY A JAGTIANI JAGTIANI & ASSOCIATES10379B DEMOCRACY LNFAIRFAX, VA 22030UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Boxes made of precious metal, ankle, and wrist bracelets, brooches, cases made of precious metal, chains, findings, identification bracelets, jewelry, jewelry pins made of precious metal for use on hats, lapel pins, and rings being jewelry | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 14, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 14, 2002 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Feb 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 2002 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 2, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |