Drawing for PEPPER PELLETS

USPTO serial 75874142

PEPPER PELLETS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRACEY, KAREN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PEPPER PELLETS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas F. Lebens

FITCH, EVEN, TABIN & FLANNERY 120-1600 S LA SALLE STCHICAGO, IL 60603UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
013Non-lethal weaponry, namely, non- lethal projectiles; launch devices for non-lethal projectiles; non- lethal substances for use in non-lethal projectiles, namely, liquid and non-liquid materials, namely, water, inert of irritant powders, Oleoresin Capsicum, marker dyes, irritants and powered or granulated metals, namely, metals, BismuthACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 28, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 28, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 24, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 21, 2001EXDMEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT—
Oct 4, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 22, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 29, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 26, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 15, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 12, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance