USPTO serial 75874142
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
San Diego, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas F. Lebens
FITCH, EVEN, TABIN & FLANNERY 120-1600 S LA SALLE STCHICAGO, IL 60603UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 013 | Non-lethal weaponry, namely, non- lethal projectiles; launch devices for non-lethal projectiles; non- lethal substances for use in non-lethal projectiles, namely, liquid and non-liquid materials, namely, water, inert of irritant powders, Oleoresin Capsicum, marker dyes, irritants and powered or granulated metals, namely, metals, Bismuth | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 28, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 24, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 21, 2001 | EXDM | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT | — |
| Oct 4, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 22, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 29, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |