USPTO serial 75874671
IQ.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2629776Status 900
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 8, 2002
- Examiner
- TINGLEY, JOHN
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IQ.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SARATOGA, CA
Saratoga, CA
Saratoga, CA
Saratoga, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David H. Judson
David H. Judson Law Office of David H. Judson15950 Dallas ParkwaySuite 225Dallas, TX 75248Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | ONLINE RETAIL STORE SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF GENERAL MERCHANDISE; CREATING AND PREPARING ONLINE ADVERTISEMENTS FOR OTHERS; INCENTIVE BUSINESS MARKETING CONSULTING SERVICES, NAMELY, MERCHANDIZING, COUPONING, INCENTIVE PROGRAMS, SURVEYING, PRODUCT SALES, E-COMMERCE, EMAIL, RICH MEDIA ONLINE ADS, SERVING ADS AND PROMOTIONS, TRACKING PROMOTIONS AND ADS, DATAMINING, SWEEPSTAKES, AND GIVE-AWAYS | EXPIRED | May 1, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by THE PRODUCT ENGINE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by IQ.commerce Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by IQ.commerce Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by IQ.commerce Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named IQ.COM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 18, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 16, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 26, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 31, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 30, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 5, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 30, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |