USPTO serial 75874705
MANTA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MANTA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
CH-1211 GENEVA, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas E. Fisher
THOMAS E FISHER WATTS, HOFFMANN, FISHER& HEINKE CO LPASTE 1750 ,100 SUPERLOR AVECLEVELAND, OH 44114-2518Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Heaters; floor heaters; underfloor heaters; heaters for deicing floors, surfaces or the ground; room heaters; heating elements | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | material in the form of bricks, tiles, sheets or mortar for screening electromagnetic interference; material comprising a blend of carbon and iron oxides (ferrite) in the form of bricks, tiles, sheets or mortar for screening electromagnetic interference; electroconductive materials in the form of bricks, tiles, sheets or mortar; electroconductive cementitious materials in the form of bricks, tiles, sheets or mortar | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 25, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |