Drawing for ERGOLOGIC

USPTO serial 75874775

ERGOLOGIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MIDDLETON, BERNICE L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ERGOLOGIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

BURTON S EHRLICH

BURTON S EHRLICH Arstein & Lehr120 South Riverdale PlazaCHICAGO, IL 60606-3910UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Posters, books, post cards, stickers and brochures, all containing information relating to wellness, health management, fitness and injury preventionACTIVE—
041provision of training courses, seminars, conferences relating to health, fitness, wellness, injury prevention and physical and mental development and well-being; provision of information relating to fitness, wellness and physical and mental development and well-being, via a global computer information networkACTIVE—
042health and injury prevention services, namely, health clubs, health resorts, health spas, and health clinics, and the provision of information relating to health, wellness and injury prevention, provided via a global computer network, advisory and consultancy services relating to health, fitness, wellness, physical and mental development and well-being and injury prevention, provided via a global computer information networkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 11, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 8, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 3, 2015GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 3, 2015GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 3, 2015CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
May 14, 2015RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Nov 14, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 22, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 9, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 9, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 9, 2013GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 9, 2013GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 9, 2013CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 8, 2013ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 8, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 3, 2013MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2013GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 27, 2013GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 27, 2013CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Mar 26, 2013RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 26, 2012GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 26, 2012GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 26, 2012CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 25, 2012ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 25, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 4, 2012MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 29, 2012GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 29, 2012GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 29, 2012CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Feb 17, 2012RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 12, 2011GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 12, 2011GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 12, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 11, 2011ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 11, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 8, 2011MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 4, 2011GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 4, 2011GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 4, 2011CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jan 26, 2011RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 26, 2010GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 26, 2010GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 26, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 9, 2010ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 9, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 9, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 22, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 24, 2009GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 24, 2009GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 24, 2009CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jun 22, 2009GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 22, 2009GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 22, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 19, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 19, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 8, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 15, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 15, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 15, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 9, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 9, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 4, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 4, 2008GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 4, 2008GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 4, 2008CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Dec 2, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 2, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 2, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 2, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 14, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 14, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 8, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 5, 2007GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 5, 2007GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 5, 2007CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
May 4, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 4, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 20, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 20, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 30, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 20, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 20, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 16, 2006GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 16, 2006CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Mar 6, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 29, 2005GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 29, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 26, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 22, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 22, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 18, 2005GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 18, 2005CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jan 28, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Nov 12, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 19, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 28, 2004GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 15, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 15, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 15, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 12, 2004CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 7, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 22, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 13, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 21, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 21, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2002CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 18, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 12, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 7, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 5, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 30, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance