USPTO serial 75876390
ROCKMAN ET AL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 22, 2001
- Examiner
- STOKOLS, GWEN P
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ROCKMAN ET AL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard B. Rockman
Howard B. Rockman REED SMITH LLP10 S. Wacker Dr.Chicago, IL 60606-7507UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | STRATEGIC PLANNING FOR EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS AND BUSINESS EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES; PRINT AND MEDIA DEVELOPMENT, NAMELY, DEVELOPING PROMOTIONAL CAMPAIGNS FOR BUSINESSES AND EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS THROUGH PRINT AND ELECTRONIC MEDIA; RESEARCH FOR THE USE OF TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION FOR EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS AND BUSINESS EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES; AND EVALUATION AND MARKET ANALYSIS IN THE FIELD OF THE USE OF TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 31, 1990 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 23, 2011 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jun 11, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| May 17, 2007 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| May 17, 2007 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 22, 2001 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 4, 2001 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 29, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |