USPTO serial 75876741
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter D. Murray
PETER D MURRAY COOPER & DUNHAM LLP1185 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10112UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTROSTATIC, ELECTROPHOTOGRAPHIC, THERMAL AND PHOTOGRAPHIC COPYING MACHINES, AND PARTS THEREFOR, NAMELY, SORTERS, COLLATORS, AUTOMATIC DOCUMENT FEEDERS AND STAPLE UNITS; DATA PROCESSORS COMPRISED OF A CENTRAL PROCESSING UNIT, DATA CONTROL HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE, A MEMORY UNIT, DATA INPUT TERMINALS AND DATA OUTPUT TERMINALS; COMPUTER DISC DRIVE, BLANK MAGNETIC COMPUTER DISCS, OPTICAL DISCS; FACSIMILE MACHINES AND PARTS THEREFOR, NAMELY, LONG-DISTANCE COPIERS, PRINTERS OPERABLE VIA TELEPHONE LINES, AUTOMATIC DOCUMENT FEEDERS AND STAPLE UNITS; SEMICONDUCTOR PRODUCTS, NAMELY, INTEGRATED CIRCUITS INCLUDING MONOLITHIC INTEGRATED CIRCUITS AND HYBRID INTEGRATED CIRCUITS, LSI AND VLSI INTEGRATED CIRCUITS; COMPUTER HARDWARE, COMPUTER PERIPHERALS, COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN NETWORKING A WIDE VARIETY OF COMPUTER HARDWARE, COMPUTER SOFTWARE, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICES, AND INSTRUCTIONAL MANUALS SOLD AS A UNIT THEREWITH; PHOTOCOPYING MACHINES; DATA PROCESSOR PERIPHERALS, NAMELY, COMPUTER KEYBOARDS, COMPUTER MICE AND COMPUTER AUDIO SPEAKERS; MODEMS; MULTIPLE-FUNCTION MACHINES FOR PRINTING, COPYING, SENDING AND RECEIVING FACSIMILE MESSAGES; DVD PLAYERS; DIGITAL CAMERAS; LASER PRINTERS, COMPUTER PRINTERS, INKJET PRINTERS; IMAGE SCANNERS; OPTICAL FILING APPARATUS, NAMELY, BARCODE SCANNERS AND BARCODE READERS | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 22, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 4, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 14, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 12, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 3, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 24, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 28, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 14, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 19, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 30, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 15, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 4, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |