USPTO serial 75876957
DO THE UNEXPECTED. DO THE RIGHT THING.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MATTHEWS, AMOS
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DO THE UNEXPECTED. DO THE RIGHT THING.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Infant, toddler, junior, misses, women's, men's and maternity clothing, namely, sleepwear, shirts, blazers, raincoats, capes, jumpers, Bermuda shorts, athletic sweat suits, skirts, sandals, jackets, jeans, jerseys, jogging suits, knitted and woven tops and bottoms, leggings, leotards, lingerie, loungewear, mittens, night shirts, nightgowns, overcoats, pajamas, pants, pants-suits, panty girdles, panty hose, parkas, peignoir sets, polo shirts, pullovers, robes, scarves, shawls, shorts, skirts, slippers, socks, sports bras, sports coats, suits, suspenders, sweaters, sweatpants, sweatshirts, swimwear, tank tops, teddies, tennis shoes, thermal underwear, ties, tops, trousers, T-shirts, turtlenecks, undergarment thongs, undergarments, undergarment supports, namely, girdles, body shapers, undershirts and unitards; vests, warm-up suits, boots, dress shoes, bandannas, bathing suits, bathing trunks, bathrobes, bed jackets, belts for clothing, bike shirts, bike shorts, blouses, body brief, boots, boxer shorts, bras, bustiers, camisoles, camp shirts, cardigans, footwear, chemises, coats, corsets, crop tops, dresses, dressing gowns, gloves, headbands, headwear, namely, hats, caps, visor; hosiery, anoraks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 12, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 14, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 3, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 5, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 12, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2004 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 9, 2004 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 7, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |