USPTO serial 75877006
KARI DESIGNS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICHARDS, LESLIE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KARI DESIGNS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Brookings, SD
Brookings, SD
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STACEY L KELLY
STACY L KELLY REED SMITH SHAW & MCCLAY LLPP O BOX 488PITTSBURGH, PA 15230-0488UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Paper plates, paper cups, household and kitchen items made from resin, wood, plaster and plastic, namely, trivets, cookie cutters, spreaders, coasters, napkin holders, spoon rests, spoon handles, place card holders, cookie jar, and salt and pepper shakers | ACTIVE | Jun 30, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 3, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 12, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 10, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 29, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 28, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 29, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 26, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |