USPTO serial 75877357
MYCITYMARKET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GASKINS, TONJA M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MYCITYMARKET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Vancouver, British Columbia, V5R 5W2, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert C. Cumbow
ROBERT C CUMBOW GRAHAM & DUNN PC1420 FIFTH AVE STE 3300SEATTLE, WA 98101-2390UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Payment services, namely, electronic processing and transmission of bill payment data on a global computer network for the sale of goods and services provided on a global computer network; financial management services for non-profit organizations, namely, arranging, facilitating the financial sponsorship of the non-profit organizations and of non-profit activities hosted, advertised or carried out on a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |