USPTO serial 75877931
INNERVATE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 21, 2003
- Examiner
- FAIRBANKS, RONALD L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with INNERVATE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
PITTSBURGH, PA
PITTSBURGH, PA
PITTSBURGH, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID V. RADACK
DAVID V RADACK ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC600 GRANT ST 44TH FLPITTSBURGH, PA 15219UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 3, 2004 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| May 17, 2004 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| May 17, 2004 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2004 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Jan 28, 2004 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 1, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 1, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 26, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 5, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 2, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 3, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 21, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 7, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 4, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |