USPTO serial 75877959
IANETWORK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHICOSKI, JENNIFER D
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IANETWORK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
North Kingstown, RI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steobeo J. Holmes
STEOBEO J HOLMES BARLOW, JOSEPBS & HOLMES101 DYER ST5TH FLPROVIDENCE, RI 02903Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Electronic mail services; and electronic transmission of data, messages, documents, advertising and multimedia content via computer terminals connected to a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Managed computer network services for a global computer network, namely providing computer network servers for supporting and delivering data to computer terminals connected to a global computer network; designing, implementing and managing computer network servers for others; updating computer software for others from remote locations; and technical support services, namely remote troubleshooting of computer software problems by global computer network connection | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 6, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 6, 2002 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 3, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 13, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |