Drawing for WEB-UPS

USPTO serial 75877964

WEB-UPS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with WEB-UPS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen Holmes

STEPHEN HOLMES BARLOW, JOSEPHS & HOLMES101 DYER ST 5TH FLPROVIDENCE, RI 02903UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Software for monitoring and management of uninterruptible power supplies over a global computer networkABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 11, 2004ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION
May 11, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
May 11, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
May 11, 2004OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999
Sep 10, 2002OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Jun 13, 2002ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
May 7, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 17, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jan 28, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 21, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 23, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance