USPTO serial 75878030
ENERGIE VITALE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AYALA, LOURDES
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ENERGIE VITALE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARC E FINEMAN
MARC E FINEMAN KEGAN & KEGAN LTD79 W MONROE ST#1320CHICAGO, IL 60603-4969Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | cosmetic and fragrance products, namely, lip make-up, eye make-up, foundation make-up, face powder, concealer, blush, nail color, cologne, toilet water, perfume, potpourri, and sets or cosmetic bags containing a variety of the above aforementioned goods, sold as a unit | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Jean-Michelle, S. A.
- Other trademarks owned by INTERNATIONAL COSMETICS AND FRAGRANCES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by INTERNATIONAL COSMETICS AND FRAGRANCES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named ENERGIE VITALE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 21, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 7, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 7, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 28, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 13, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 4, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 6, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 9, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 15, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 26, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 6, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 20, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 4, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |