USPTO serial 75878319
MERRILLDIRECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2553591Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 26, 2002
- Examiner
- SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MERRILLDIRECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Janal M. Kalis
CHARLES E STEFFEY SCHWEGMAN, LUDBERG, WOESSNER & KLUTHPO BOX 2938, 1600 TCF TWR 121 S 8TH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0938Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Data processing services, namely, creating, editing, distributing and collaborating on documents via the global computer network | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Jan 31, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Merrill Communications LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Merrill Communications LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Merrill Communications LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named MERRILLDIRECT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 7, 2004 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 27, 2004 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2002 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 26, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 2001 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 7, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 7, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 26, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 6, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 20, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 5, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 4, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 16, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 6, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |