USPTO serial 75878634
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Seaview, Wellington, NZ
Seaview, Wellington, NZ
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donald L. Dennison
DONALD L DENNISON DENNISON, SCHEINER, SCHULTZ & WAKEMANSTE 6121745 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWYARLINGTON, VA 22202| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Office and home office furniture | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 29, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 11, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Oct 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 3, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 5, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jun 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 31, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| May 10, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 5, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 10, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 12, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 11, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 28, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 22, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |