USPTO serial 75879637
WE MAKE EBUSINESS PERFORM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EULIN, INGRID C
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WE MAKE EBUSINESS PERFORM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GEORGE R. SCHULTZ
GEORGE R SCHULTZ SCHULTZ & ASSOCIATES, PCSTE 525ONE LINCOLN CTR 5400 LBJ FWYDALLAS, TX 75240Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | COMPUTER CONSULTATION SERVICES FOR THE DESIGN, SIMULATION, EVALUATION, MAINTENANCE AND SYSTEM MANAGEMENT OF COMPLEX ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Hyperformix, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Scientific and Engineering Software, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Scientific and Engineering Software, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named WE MAKE EBUSINESS PERFORM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 25, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 16, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 4, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 17, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2003 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Feb 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 22, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 22, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 10, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 4, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 4, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 11, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 22, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 8, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 6, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |