Drawing for VISA WEB

USPTO serial 75879910

VISA WEB

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VISA WEB?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DENISE Y. KUWABARA

DENISE Y KUWABARA VISA INTERNATIONAL SERVICE ASSOCIATION900 METRO CTR BLVDMAILSTOP M1-11AFOSTER CITY, CA 94404

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Financial services, namely, banking, bill payment services, credit card services, debit card services, cash disbursement services, pre-paid card services, namely, issuing cards containing stored value, issuing travelers checks, providing travel insurance, deposit access services, automated teller machine services, stored value card services, point of sale and point of transaction electronic payment services, and electronic funds currency transfer services; providing information about financial services in the field of banking, bill payment services, credit card services, debit card services, cash disbursement services, pre-paid card services offered through cards containing stored value, issuing travelers checks, providing travel insurance, deposit access services, automated teller machine services, stored value services, point of sale and point of transaction electronic payment services, and electronic funds currency transfer services over the InternetACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 10, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 10, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 4, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
May 4, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
May 4, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 12, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Nov 3, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Nov 3, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 11, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
May 5, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Apr 29, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Apr 29, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 5, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Nov 5, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Nov 5, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 19, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
May 5, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
May 5, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 5, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 13, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 13, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 24, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 10, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 4, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Dec 11, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 15, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
May 1, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 9, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 15, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 12, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 23, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 19, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance