USPTO serial 75881446
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. GUSTAV LARSON
ALLYN TAYLOR GRAY CARY WARE & FRIEDENRICH LLP2000 UNIVERSITY AVEEAST PALO ALTO, CA 94303-2248UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE USED TO MEASURE THE PERFORMANCE OF GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK SERVER INSTALLATIONS AND TO INCREASE THE RELIABILITY AND PERFORMANCE OF GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK SERVER INSTALLATIONS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER CONSULTING SERVICES, NAMELY, DESIGNING, CONFIGURING, INSTALLING AND MAINTAINING AND PROVIDING TECHNICAL SUPPORT FOR VIA TELEPHONE E-MAIL, TELEGRAPH, FACSIMILE, AND ON-SITE DISCUSSIONS OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND HARDWARE USED TO MEASURE THE PERFORMANCE OF GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK SERVER INSTALLATIONS AND INCREASE THE RELIABILITY AND PERFORMANCE OF GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK INSTALLATIONS; COMPUTER CONSULTING SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING TECHNICAL SUPPORT FOR OTHERS VIA TELEPHONE, E-MAIL, TELEGRAPH, FACSIMILE, AND ON-SITE DISCUSSIONS OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND HARDWARE USED TO MEASURE THE PERFORMANCE OF GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK SERVER INSTALLATION AND TO INCREASE THE RELIABILITY AND PERFORMANCE OF GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK INSTALLATIONS; COMPUTER CONSULTING SERVICES, NAMELY, WEB-BASED REMOTE MONITORING OF COMPUTER NETWORK SERVERS AVAILABILITY AND PERFORMANCE | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |